Axisflying C227
| Stator | 2207 |
|---|---|
| KV options | 1960 |
| Weight | 35.8 g |
| Shaft | 5mm |
| Max cells | 4-6S |
| Configuration | 12N14P |
| Dimensions | Ø28x32.5 mm |
| Mount (bolt circle, mm) | Ø16 (4-M3) |
| Winding resistance | 64.75 mOhm |
| Max thrust | 1582.6 g |
| Price (approx.) | 27.49 USD |
At 35.8 g it is 2.6 g heavier than average across the 39 2207-class motors in our database (avg 33.2 g).
Best props for the C227
5in props - Axisflying gives the Application as "5-inch Cinewhoop / Cinematic FPV" and bench-tests the motor on a 5x5 three-blade
Thrust data (Axisflying bench test)
| KV | Prop | Battery | Throttle | Current | RPM | Thrust | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 30 | 4.1 A | 14776.4 | 340.59 g | 3.42 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 40 | 6.3 A | 17287.87 | 482.22 g | 3.09 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 50 | 10.13 A | 20185.47 | 644.61 g | 2.57 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 60 | 14.59 A | 22828.6 | 828.27 g | 2.3 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 70 | 21.29 A | 25364.5 | 1050.43 g | 1.99 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 80 | 28.24 A | 27831.0 | 1234.26 g | 1.76 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 90 | 36.37 A | 27957.0 | 1461.86 g | 1.63 g/W |
| 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 6S | 100 | 42.74 A | 27957.0 | 1582.6 g | 1.51 g/W |
Manufacturer bench figures (Axisflying bench, 1960 KV on a 5*5 three-blade prop at 6S (24.54-24.96 V), 8 throttle points (30-100%)); real-world thrust varies with ESC, battery sag and prop condition.
C227 vs other 2207 motors on 6S
The same thrust costs different power on different motors. Each line is one maker's own bench series (6S, its own prop), drawn as grams of thrust per watt against thrust, so a higher line makes that thrust for less battery current. Throttle percent is left out on purpose: it means something different on every maker's rig.
| Motor | KV | Prop | Peak thrust | At 1350 g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axisflying C227 | 1960 | 5x5 three-blade | 1583 g at 1049 W | 797 W (1.69 g/W) | |
| Axisflying AF2207.5 | 1960 | GF 51466 V2 | 1388 g at 1010 W | 963 W (1.4 g/W) | |
| Axisflying x SupaflyFPV x SyncFPV 2207.5 | 1960 | BB4943.5 | 1819 g at 962 W | 610 W (2.21 g/W) | |
| GEPRC SPEEDX2 2207E | 1960 | 5136 | 1431 g at 1123 W | 1012 W (1.33 g/W) | |
| T-Motor F60 Pro IV V2 2207.5 | 1950 | T-Motor T5150 Tri-Blade | 1838 g at 950 W | 590 W (2.29 g/W) | |
| T-Motor Pacer V3.2 2207 | 1950 | T-Motor T5143S-3 | 1815 g at 1114 W | 688 W (1.96 g/W) |
Power at 1350 g is read off each maker's curve, straight-line between its two nearest bench points; 1350 g is the highest thrust every motor here reached. Different props and rigs move these curves as much as the motor does, so compare rows on a similar prop. Peak thrust of every 2207 motor: 2207 motors compared. How to read a bench table: reading motor bench tables.
Thrust-to-weight with this motor
Four Axisflying C227 motors at 1582.6 g max thrust each give 6330.4 g: 2:1, the minimum to fly, up to 3165.2 g all-up; 4:1 (freestyle) up to 1582.6 g; 8:1 (racing) up to 791.3 g.
RPM & prop speed on this motor
Props in this motor's class
| Prop | Size | Blades | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| HQProp ETHIX S3 5x3.1x3 | 5.0x3.1 | 3 | 3.6 g |
| HQProp ETHIX S4 5x3.7x3 | 5.0x3.7 | 3 | 3.6 g |
| HQProp ETHIX S5 5x4x3 | 5.0x4.0 | 3 | 3.7 g |
| HQProp V2S Freestyle 5x4.3x3 | 5.0x4.3 | 3 | 3.8 g |
| HQProp 5x4.3x3 V1S | 5x4.3 | 3 | 3.81 g |
Where this data comes from
Axisflying publishes the whole C227 sheet as the fifth of five description images on /products/c227-5-inch-c2207-1960kv-brushless-motor (C22705.jpg, 1175x2969): a dimension drawing, one Specification block and one Testing data table, the other four images being marketing art. Identity against the RaceDayQuads listing we price from is ten figures shared to the digit - 1960 KV, 12N14P, 64.75 mOhm, 5 mm shaft, 20# 150 mm silicone leads, 35.8 g wire included, 1048.66 W max power, 42.74 A peak, 1.1 A idle and a 28x32.5 mm body - so the retailer is reprinting this block. The sheet is one winding on one prop: 1960 KV on a 5*5 three-blade at 6S, eight throttle points (30-100%), ending at a motor internal temperature of 98 degC against a 26 degC ambient. The spec block's Max Power and Peak Current are that run's own 100% row (1048.66 W / 42.74 A), so the spec-block cross-check lands; all 8 rows also pass the efficiency identity and printed power = V x A. Max thrust is the 100% row's 1582.60 g; the page carried no max thrust before, and it carried no stator, weight or prop recommendation either, which is why it had no page. Three source facts recorded rather than repaired. First, the cell count: this motor is rated 4-6S by the product's own schema.org name ("Motor C227 4-6s", SKU A02010090), by the Specs list in the page body ("Rated Voltage: 4-6S LiPo") and by the image spec block ("Rated Voltage 4-6S"), while the page's HTML <title> tag ends "... / Cinewhoop 6-8S" and the variant label reads "6s For 5inch drone" - and it is the title tag that RaceDayQuads reprinted as "Rated Voltage: 6-8S", which is what our max_cells held. Three manufacturer statements and a 6S bench run against one SEO title, so max_cells is now 4-6S. Second, RPM is flat across the top of the run: 27957.00 at both 90% and 100% while thrust still rises 1461.86 -> 1582.60 g and current 36.37 -> 42.74 A, the same shape as the AF2207.5's 70% row. Third, five of the eight printed efficiencies are not exactly thrust / (V x A) - the 30% row prints 3.42 g/W where its own three columns give 3.33, the widest of them at 2.6% - so the column is rounded off the rig rather than computed off the printed row; all eight stay inside check_thrust.py's 6% band. The drawing's mount callout is four M3 holes on a Phi 16+/-0.05 bolt circle, i.e. an 11.3 mm square, restated in the page body as "Mount: 4-M3"; as on the AF2207.5 and the collaboration 2207.5 it is left out of mount_mm, which holds square patterns. recommended_props is the manufacturer's own: the body names the Application as "5-inch Cinewhoop / Cinematic FPV", which is the class our stator table had derived anyway.